There are a lot of methodologies and simulation tools in the world to assess the energy demand of a building. The results of simulation tools often differ, but the causes are not analysed in more detail. The article compares the results of two most widely used dynamic energy simulation tools – DesignBuilder and IES-VE, when simulation of identical building model with the same assumptions in both programs is performed. In addition, for comparison, calculations are performed with the PHPP program, as well as using STR2.09.04:2008 methodology. The tools compare the heating, cooling capacity, energy consumption of the building for heating and cooling the building during the simulation. Following differences comparing energy demands gained with two different simulation tools are defined: ventilation – up to 11%, cooling – up to 9%, heating – up to 5%.

Article in: Lithuanian

Article published: 2017-09-29